Roger Federer and Tiger Woods for sure but I am throwing in Edward Norton?

It’s been made clear how I feel about Tiger Woods.

I have long withheld judgment on Roger Federer. I can’t anymore. Simply awesome. I play tennis pretty well. Not so much a fan anymore, nor do I play much. I only enjoy watching tennis at this time of the year – for the US Open. Love New York, love the crowds, the fast surface, the technology, the sexy female outfits and new duds the men sport and the Lexus L on the nets. Evrything is loud and bold.

Roger is just the opposite. He was outstanding again this week. He has the whole package, but most important – HE CLOSES. That is why Tiger made an appearance today. He knew as I did, that the match was a formaility and he was safe backing Federer, the sure thing. Superman of tennis.

Maybe they will just start a commune for excellence. If and when they do, they should let Edward Norton in for the coolness factor.

After the match, Ellen and I went to see the Illusionist. Edward Norton is the Tiger Woods and Roger Federer of acting. He does it all.

One big difference – Edward Norton has to do it as a different persona and character each time. You can’t pin that guy down. He is my favorite actor – maybe ever.

Go see the Illusionist.

Oh and Caaaaards winnnnn the stadium opener beating the hapless 49ers. That cost me – otherwise a perfect day. That won’t last though (Cardinals winning) – trust me :)

3 comments

  1. Pingback: “…the soft rock revolution is coming…” And other things you might have missed (The Monday Remix) « chartreuse (BETA)

Comments are closed.